Skip to main content

Free Your Mind by En Vogue: Anti-Prejudice Anthem Needs An Update




     Free your mind is an anti-prejudice song released in 1992 by the American female group En Vogue. The song covers the topics of sexism, racism, prejudice, and stereotypes. Despite this song being released 30 years ago, the topics in this song are still extremely relevant today, as many people, especially those with marginalized identities, who have to face sexism, racism, prejudice, and stereotypes every day.  

Before analyzing the lyrics of the song, I'm going to go over some definitions. Prejudice is a negative attitude toward another person or group formed in advance of any experience with that person or group. Prejudice can include a cognitive component, which includes assumptions and beliefs about a group, like stereotypes, and a behavioral component which includes negative behaviors, including discrimination and violence. Prejudice based on racial grouping is racism and prejudice based on sex is sexism (American Psychological Association, n.d.). 

    The opening line of the song (spoken) is
    "Prejudice, wrote a song about it. Like to hear it? Here it go!"

     Then the song begins with the lyrics, 

     I wear tight clothing, high-heeled shoes
     It doesn't mean that I'm a prostitute no, no
     I like rap music, wear hip-hop clothes
     That doesn't mean that I'm out sellin' dope, no, no, no

    Right off of the bat, this song addresses racism, negative stereotypes, and prejudice. The first negative stereotype mentioned in this song is that women that wear tight clothing and high heals are prostitutes. There is also the stigma associated with prostitutes, as purity culture and the gender roles influence attitudes towards sex work. Research conducted by Kempadoo and Doezema (1998; pg. 9-14) examined the stereotypes associated with working in sex work industry and found that many individuals commonly viewed individuals participating in sex work as “whores.” When women are called demeaning names like "whore" or compared to a prostitute when wearing tight clothing and high heels, people are trying to demean them by comparing them to people in our society that are deeply discriminated against, and are insulting the woman. It is also sexist, as a man dressed in tight clothing would not receive the same treatment. All of the members of En Vogue are black women. The lyrics talking about liking rap and wearing hip-hop clothes and not selling dope, has to do with the stereotype of a young black individual who likes these things selling drugs. This stereotype is based on a deep rooted prejudice, in which people assume that all young black people who listen to rap and wear hip-hop clothes must sell drugs, because given the color of their skin and their interests, it only makes sense. This is racist, prejudice, and can cause racial stress.

    Another verse in the song goes:

    So I'm a sista     Buy things with cash     That really doesn't mean that all my credit's bad     Oh     So why dispute me and waste my time?     Because you really think the price is high for me     I can't look without being watched, no     You rang my buy before I made up my mind     Oww

    These verses deal with a black woman being stereotyped in a store in which the sales-person assumes that they a) have bad credit because they pay in cash, b) cannot afford the prices in the store, and c) are being watched as they shop because the sales-person assumes they can't afford the products. This is racist and prejudiced (being stereotyped and discriminated against) as a person is making an assumption about a person based on the color of their skin, and the beliefs they have about that racial group, and then acting on those thoughts by watching them shop when they wouldn't treat a white individual the same way.

    The lyrics in the chorus of the song are the reason I chose to do a blog post on it. The lyrics in the chorus are:

    Free your mind     And the rest will follow     Be color-blind     Don't be so shallow     Free your mind     And the rest will follow     Be color-blind     Don't be so shallow
    The lyric that jumped out at me here was "be color-blind, don't be so shallow." In class we have talked about color-blind ideology and a multicultural approach to racism, and based on research, in the majority of cases, we should take a multicultural approach to in order to live successfully within a racially diverse society (Plaut et al. 2009; Plaut et al. 2018). While the colorblind approach to racism was very popular at the time this song came out, the color-blind approach doesn’t acknowledge people’s differences – ignoring race, culture, and ethnicity. The multicultural approach acknowledges and respects people’s differences (like race, culture, and ethnicity). This song was released 30 years ago, a time when color-blind ideology was wide spread and taught to many people as a way to approach racism and live successfully within a racially diverse society. I would suggest an update to the song, something like, 

    Free your mind
    And the rest will follow
    Don't be color-blind,
    Don't be so shallow
    Free your mind
    And the rest will follow
    Don't be color-blind
    Don't be so shallow

    with a verse talking about the benefits of taking a multicultural approach. 



References

American Psychological Association. (n.d.). APA Dictionary of Psychology.
            
          https://dictionary.apa.org/prejudice

Kempadoo, K., & Doezema, J. (1998). Global sex workers: Rights, resistance, and redefinition

        Routledge. ISBN 0-415-91828-6 (cloth). — ISBN 0-415-91829-4 (pbk.)Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M.,    & Goren, M. J. (2009). Journal of Psychological Science 20(4), 444-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x

Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., & Goren, M. J. (2009). Journal of Psychological Science 20(4), 444-446. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02318.x

Plaut, V. C., Thomas, K. M., Hurd, K., & Romano, C. A. (2018). Do Color Blindness and Multiculturalism Remedy or Foster Discrimination and Racism? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(3), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418766068





    













Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Colonization of Hawaii and the Lasting Effects

Since learning about the colonization of Hawaii by the U.S. government and the impact colonization has had on Native Hawaiians for centuries, I have been doing a lot of reflecting on the topic, my previous visits to Hawaii, and why we aren't taught about the colonialist past of Hawaii. I started doing research on the colonization of Hawaii and how it effects Native Hawaiians. In my multicultural psychology class we watched parts of a documentary called " Hawaii the Stolen Paradise ," I was shocked that I had never learned about the history of Hawaii before and so I watched the whole documentary and did some other research to further educate myself. A Brief History of the Colonization of Hawaii  Hawaii is an archipelago made up of eight islands. Native Hawaiians are Polynesian and are thought to have come from Tahiti or  the Marquesas Islands. By the 12th or 13th century Hawaiians were living on their own, and formed different kingdoms. In 1810, King Kamehameha united all

Morality, Religion, Justice and The Book of Mormon Musical

       When we learned about morality, religion, and justice my multicultural psychology class, we talked about the controversy in Denmark that sparks international crisis in 2005. A Danish man wanted to write a children's book about the prophet Muhammad, and was looking for a Muslim person to illustrate the book. He couldn't find anyone to illustrate his book because in the Muslim faith while there is no explicit ban on depicting the prophet Muhammad it is considered extremely disrespectful. The Danish author became frustrated and published a cartoon in his local paper depicting the prophet Muhammad with a bomb on his turban. This caused outrage in the Muslim community world wide; riots were held and people died. Despite this, the man behind the cartoon, Kurt Westergaard, the newspaper, and the Danish government did not apologize because Kurt Westergaard was expressing his freedom of speech. My professor asked the class who was morally right - the Muslim community or the Danes