Skip to main content

University of Utah Football Team Uses "Ute" Name With Permission of the Ute Tribe: Why This is Problematic

 

  
                                                                      J. Dixon Modeling Game 9 Uniform 2022
                                                                                                  Courtesy of utes_equiptment on instagram

    Above is a picture of a University of Utah football player modeling their game 9 uniform from this past season. On his helmet you can see the drum and feather logo, which is sacred to the Ute tribe. You can also see this symbol on the football he is holding. In recent years, there has been a lot of controversy around sports teams named after or depicting Native Indian culture. After mounting pressures to change their name, in 2020, the "Washington Redskins" (NFL team in Washington) changes their name to the "Washington Football Team" before rebranding as the "Commanders" earlier this year. So why can the University of Utah football team be called the "Utes" and use sacred symbols on their uniforms? Let's take a look at the history of the University of Utah being called the "Utes."

    The U of U first chose the name the “Runnin’ Utes". In In 1972, the name was changed to "Utes."  The University of Utah has had an agreement with the Ute tribe to use the "Ute" name starting in that year. In return for  allowing the school’s athletic department to use its name, the university has supported scholarships for tribal members and agreed to support those students through graduation. The mascot for the "Utes" until the mid 1980's was the "Crimson warrior" who was a Caucasian horseman who would ride into the arena before home football games and would stab a spear into a bale of hay. In 1996, Swoop ( a hawk) became the "Utes" official mascot through an agreement with the Ute tribe. In 2005, the NCAA identified the University of Utah as 1 of 18 colleges that still used American Indian names and symbols. Instead of changing their name, the University got renewed support from the tribe. The most recent update to this agreement was made in 2020 and will hold until 2025. As part of the new agreement, the school must educate all incoming students about the tribe. To do this, the University launched the Ute Proud program to showcase traditions during football games, basketball games, and gymnastics meets. The Ute Proud program also teaches fans about inappropriate behavior such as wearing headdresses and red paint. As another part of the agreement, the University of Utah provides annual financial support to the tribe for K-12 education on the reservation in northeastern Utah, and supports scholarships for Ute tribe members. Despite this, only 200 out of the 33,000 students at the University of Utah identify as American Indian, with an even smaller portion of those students being Ute tribe members. 

    So yes, technically the University of Utah has an agreement with the Ute tribe to use their name and a sacred symbol, but one could argue that it's not a fair trade. Historically, American Indians have been pushed out of their homes and oppressed by large corporations and the U.S. government. This has left many tribes in financially desperate situations. If the Ute tribe agreed to let the University athletics department use the name "Utes" in return for financial support, especially the opportunity for students in their community to go to college, with the Ute Proud program being implemented it probably felt like the right thing to do for the community. However, I'm not sure the University of Utah has held up their end of the bargain. As I mentioned earlier, according to recent statistics only 200 students at the U of U identify as Native Indian. The Ute tribe has a membership of 2,970 people. Based on both of those numbers it can be assumed that only a handful of Ute students attend the U of U. It seems as though the University is profiting greatly from this agreement and that the Utes are not profiting enough. 

   But the issue runs deeper than asking if the University is doing enough for Ute tribe members. The drum and feather logo is scared to many American Indian tribes, not just Utes, so to see it flaunted is could be unfair to many who think that the Utes have no right to give universal permission for their use. The drum symbolizes the heartbeat of Mother Earth and its people. Feathers, particularly eagle feathers, are valued as pathways for the wearers to express themselves to the creator. The white and dark parts of the eagle feather are said to represent daylight and darkness and summer and winter. Birds carry the messages between Earth and the spirits above. 

    In recent years, it seemed the "Utes" athletic department was moving away from using the drum and feather in favor of the block "U" symbol. Perhaps the most fair thing the University of Utah should change their sports teams names (the women's gymnastics team is called the "lady red rocks"), stop using the drum and feather symbol, and continue to support the Ute tribe because they allowed them to use their name for so many years. 

Sources




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Free Your Mind by En Vogue: Anti-Prejudice Anthem Needs An Update

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7iQbBbMAFE       Free your mind is an anti-prejudice song released in 1992 by the American female group En Vogue. The song covers the topics of sexism, racism, prejudice, and stereotypes. Despite this song being released 30 years ago, the topics in this song are still extremely relevant today, as many people, especially those with marginalized identities, who have to face sexism, racism, prejudice, and stereotypes every day.   Before analyzing the lyrics of the song, I'm going to go over some definitions. Prejudice is a negative attitude toward another person or group formed in advance of any experience with that person or group. Prejudice can include a cognitive component, which includes assumptions and beliefs about a group, like stereotypes, and a behavioral component which includes negative behaviors, including discrimination and violence. Prejudice based on racial grouping is racism and prejudice based on sex is sexism (American Psychological A

The Colonization of Hawaii and the Lasting Effects

Since learning about the colonization of Hawaii by the U.S. government and the impact colonization has had on Native Hawaiians for centuries, I have been doing a lot of reflecting on the topic, my previous visits to Hawaii, and why we aren't taught about the colonialist past of Hawaii. I started doing research on the colonization of Hawaii and how it effects Native Hawaiians. In my multicultural psychology class we watched parts of a documentary called " Hawaii the Stolen Paradise ," I was shocked that I had never learned about the history of Hawaii before and so I watched the whole documentary and did some other research to further educate myself. A Brief History of the Colonization of Hawaii  Hawaii is an archipelago made up of eight islands. Native Hawaiians are Polynesian and are thought to have come from Tahiti or  the Marquesas Islands. By the 12th or 13th century Hawaiians were living on their own, and formed different kingdoms. In 1810, King Kamehameha united all

Morality, Religion, Justice and The Book of Mormon Musical

       When we learned about morality, religion, and justice my multicultural psychology class, we talked about the controversy in Denmark that sparks international crisis in 2005. A Danish man wanted to write a children's book about the prophet Muhammad, and was looking for a Muslim person to illustrate the book. He couldn't find anyone to illustrate his book because in the Muslim faith while there is no explicit ban on depicting the prophet Muhammad it is considered extremely disrespectful. The Danish author became frustrated and published a cartoon in his local paper depicting the prophet Muhammad with a bomb on his turban. This caused outrage in the Muslim community world wide; riots were held and people died. Despite this, the man behind the cartoon, Kurt Westergaard, the newspaper, and the Danish government did not apologize because Kurt Westergaard was expressing his freedom of speech. My professor asked the class who was morally right - the Muslim community or the Danes